It’s no secret that I am not a fan of the public school system. It is a system that rewards mediocrity and, at best, ignores excellence and, at worst, discourages it. It is a system designed to cater to the lowest common denominator, and to stifle those that would rise above it. In short the public school system is about control.
It is not about making people smart. It is not about teaching teaching them life skills. It is not about creating successful happy people. It is about control.
“It is a rare child indeed who can come through his schooling with much left of his curiosity, his independence, or his sense of his own dignity, competence, and worth.”
John Holt, The Underachieving School
For many people it’s hard to believe that there is anything sinister about the school system. It’s difficult to view that nice lady that teaches your kid math and English as being involved is something ugly. But the truth is that she is, though her participation is almost certainly born out of the same well intentioned, but ignorant beliefs about school that you and most of the population have.
To understand why public schools are so bad, we have to look at why, and by who, they were created in the first place. This article will focus on the American school system, but make no mistake, this all applies equally to Canadian schools, and the public school system of most other western countries. If if looks like a fish, smells like a fish, then it is a fish.
Prior the creation of the public school system, the education of children was designed to make good citizens, and to ensure each student found some particular talents to develop to the maximum.
That purpose live on today in our colleges and universities, in which students self-direct their education, choosing their own course of study based on their own personal talents and interests. Sadly that is not the case in the primary education system in which every imaginable subject is forced down the throats of every child, whether that child has an interest in it or not. Few ever question the rationale behind this policy, it is more or less blindly accepted that every child’s future depends on them learning algebra at the age of twelve, and God forbid they should find it boring or un-stimulating, or they’ll be put on Ritalin and drugged into submission.
The very idea of forced education being necessary is false. As human beings we are naturally curious and excited to learn, and at no time in our lives is that desire stronger than in childhood. Before a child has ever set foot in a school he was already done immense amounts of learning. He has learned to eat, to talk, to walk, and often to read, or ride a bike, or swim without ever having to be forced. A young child never complains about having to learn, because everything he learns fulfils his/her natural curiosity about the world.
And yet out public school are filled with miserable bored students for whom learning has become a punishment rather than a pleasure, and school feels like a prison. Schools are filled with angry children, bullying is rampant. Strict adherence to the curriculum is enforced. Students who read a ahead in class or otherwise go beyond mediocrity are not encouraged, they are often scolded! Students who dislike math are labelled with various “learning disabilities”. Misguided “gifted” programs spring up that do little except to cause further social dysfunction in the classroom. Kids are given pointless test that are in no way a measure of intelligence or aptitude, but rather a test of short term memory.
So what happened to create the public school system as it is today, and why? Corporate American happened. The leaders of the industrial revolution realized that their success depended on not only having an easy to control workforce, but and easy to control, predictable customer as well. The public school system was devised to create both. It is no accident that public schools do nothing to teach kids how to manage finances, how to create wealth, entrepreneurship, personal responsibility, and self reliance. People with such knowledge are exactly the opposite of what corporations need for success. They are also exactly the opposite of what politician and governments need to retain power.
The utter irrelevancy of the public school system can be seen easily if one looks at how many brilliant or successful people were either terrible students (according to test scores) or dropped out entirely:
- Albert Einstein
- Richard Branson (Billionaire, founder of Virgin Records)
- Peter Jennings
- The Wright Brothers (invented a little thing called the airplane)
- Quentin Tarantino
- George Eastman (founder of Kodak)
Some may argue that school serves another purpose, that of teaching kids social skills and how to function in a society. Frankly, that’s bullshit. The society present in the unnatural environment of public school can hardly be considered a desirable one. Those who function at the top of the food chain the public school society would be considered some of the most despicable citizens in the world if their behaviour were continued beyond high school. The rest of the school population survives as social outcasts for the most part.
Public Schools exist to create mindless consumers and easily manipulated workers, nothing more. You can’t live in The Limelight with the baggage of the public school system hanging over your head. Escape the mind numbing propaganda you learned in school, and start living creatively.
There is a book called The Teenage Liberation Handbook by Grace Llewellyn that I strongly suggest you read.

Updates via RSS
Follow on Twitter








why is anyone relying on the public school system to teach their children anything. learning first begins at home, the rest is supplemental. .02
Glad you agree, Natural, thanks for stopping by.
I agree! Too many parents think that they can sit back and do nothing and that the schools should raise and educate their children! Drives me crazy! NCLM
Hear! Hear!
People think I’m crazy when I tell them how damaging public school is and all the reasons why I plan on homeschooling my kids. As the other commentors have said, it is the place of the parents to teach their children and raise them, not the schools.
Here via NCLM
This was a fascinating post, thanks. I have mixed feelings about public school myself. My husband hated it and did very poorly, whereas I was a bright student and – in high school – did very well. I enjoyed it in part because I was able to choose many of my classes and therefore learn things I was interested in.
Now we’re in the next generation – my 6 yr old son. He IS in public school right now and so far, so good. I wanted to homeschool but with 2 parents working, that just isn’t a possibility. So, like the first commentor, I hope that the education and love of learning I instill in him at home will be helpful in counterbalancing any negativity he experiences in school.
Thanks for all the comments!
Heather: I hope your son does well too, but even I had fun in school when I was 6 years old. The rest of it was pure misery I am afraid. Good luck!
I too have had my concerns with the educational and social aspects of schools as a whole. My daughter is able to learn quickly and has a great memory of what she learns, plus she’s an advanced reader. She was able to read and understand what she read out of college textbooks at age 6. Yet her teacher wanted to label her a ADD because she got bored in class. Your explanation as to why schools are structured the way they are was enlightening. I say, keep up the good work.
Hi Lea,
Your story is sadly very typical. Keep a close eye on your daughter, she sounds like a very bright child, and public school will crush her if it is given the chance or if you don’t help her to build up her defences to it.
Thanks for stopping by.
This is sad but true. The public school system is crap. It is one big babysitting agency,if you will… Homeschooling is the way to go.
You are quite right about schools. The best part of your post is your explanation of the influence of Industrialization or “Corporate America” as you called it. Bravo for saying so! I wish more people could recognize that!
An interesting post indeed. I have worked in public education and a lot of what you say resembles reality. Considering the size of the population however, there is no viable alternative available to compete with the monopoly system in place.
Sure, homeschool is an option, private-tuition schools are available, but for the masses, mass-produced is about the only option.
It sure raises a point about the critical need for parents to be very involved in all that their children are doing at school. Not only to be sure their children keep a reasonably balance view of life, but that they are also encouraged to go beyond what is required of them in the classroom.
My children may have learned fractions, etc at school but they learned a whole lot more about life from time spent with my me and my wife.
The system cannot easily be avoided so offset it with time for quality child-parent interaction.